Aditya Dhar, the director of the recently released film “Dhurandhar,” has addressed the critical feedback from survivors of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks regarding the film’s portrayal of the events. The film, which dramatizes the harrowing experiences of those affected by the attacks, has sparked a significant conversation about the representation of trauma in cinema and the responsibilities of filmmakers when depicting real-life tragedies.
“Dhurandhar,” which premiered on December 15, 2025, has been met with mixed reviews, particularly from individuals who lived through the 2008 attacks. Survivors have expressed concerns that the film may not fully capture the complexities of their experiences, suggesting that it risks sensationalizing their trauma for entertainment purposes. In response to this feedback, Dhar emphasized the importance of portraying the “brutal truth” of the events while acknowledging the emotional weight carried by those who survived.
The 26/11 attacks, which resulted in the deaths of 166 people and left over 300 injured, were a series of coordinated shootings and bombings carried out by ten members of the terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba. The attacks targeted multiple locations in Mumbai, including the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, the Oberoi Trident Hotel, and the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus. The incident has since been etched into the collective memory of India, leading to numerous artistic interpretations, including films, documentaries, and literature.
Dhar’s film aims to shed light on the resilience of the human spirit in the face of such adversity. However, survivors have pointed out that while the film attempts to honor their stories, it may inadvertently gloss over the nuances of their trauma. In a recent interview, Dhar acknowledged the challenges of balancing artistic expression with the need for sensitivity. He stated, “As a filmmaker, I strive to tell stories that resonate with audiences, but I also understand that these narratives can be deeply personal for those who lived through them.”
The director’s comments come at a time when the film industry is increasingly scrutinized for its portrayal of real-life events, particularly those involving violence and suffering. Critics argue that filmmakers have a moral obligation to approach such subjects with care, ensuring that the dignity of victims and survivors is preserved. This debate has gained traction in recent years, with several high-profile films facing backlash for their depictions of historical events.
“Dhurandhar” has also sparked discussions about the broader implications of representing trauma in media. Experts in psychology and trauma studies have noted that while art can serve as a powerful tool for healing and understanding, it can also risk re-traumatizing individuals if not handled appropriately. The conversation surrounding the film highlights the need for filmmakers to engage with survivors and experts during the creative process to ensure a respectful and accurate representation of their experiences.
In the wake of the film’s release, Dhar has expressed his willingness to engage in dialogue with survivors and their families. He has invited feedback and discussions about the film’s content, emphasizing that he values the perspectives of those who experienced the attacks firsthand. This approach reflects a growing trend in the film industry, where creators are increasingly seeking input from affected communities to inform their work.
The release of “Dhurandhar” and the subsequent reactions from survivors underscore the ongoing impact of the 26/11 attacks on Indian society. The event remains a pivotal moment in the nation’s history, shaping public discourse around security, terrorism, and resilience. As the film continues to be screened across the country, it is likely to provoke further discussions about the representation of trauma in media and the responsibilities of artists in portraying sensitive subjects.
In conclusion, Aditya Dhar’s response to the feedback from 26/11 survivors highlights the complexities of depicting real-life tragedies in film. As “Dhurandhar” navigates the delicate balance between storytelling and sensitivity, it serves as a reminder of the enduring scars left by the attacks and the importance of honoring the voices of those who lived through them. The ongoing dialogue surrounding the film may pave the way for more thoughtful and inclusive representations of trauma in the future.
