Mohan Bhagwat, the chief of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), delivered a significant address in Kolkata on December 21, 2025, emphasizing the need to distinguish between the RSS and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). This statement comes at a time when the two organizations are often perceived as synonymous, particularly in the context of Indian politics.
In his speech, Bhagwat urged the audience not to view the RSS through the lens of the BJP, asserting that while the two share ideological roots, they operate in different spheres. The RSS, founded in 1925, is a Hindu nationalist organization that focuses on cultural and social issues, while the BJP, established in 1980, is a political party that seeks to gain power through electoral means. Bhagwat’s remarks highlight a long-standing debate about the relationship between the RSS and the BJP, particularly as the latter has risen to prominence in Indian politics over the past two decades.
Bhagwat’s address took place during a gathering of RSS members and supporters, where he discussed the organization’s role in promoting Hindu culture and values. He reiterated that the RSS is a volunteer organization dedicated to nation-building and social service, and he called for a clearer understanding of its mission. “The RSS is not a political party; it is a cultural organization that aims to unite people under the banner of Indian identity,” he stated.
The distinction between the RSS and the BJP has been a contentious issue in Indian politics. Critics often argue that the BJP’s policies are heavily influenced by the RSS’s ideology, particularly regarding issues such as religious nationalism and social conservatism. Supporters of the BJP, on the other hand, contend that the party operates independently and is accountable to the electorate.
Bhagwat’s comments come against the backdrop of increasing scrutiny of the BJP’s governance and its handling of various social issues. The party has faced criticism for its approach to religious minorities, economic policies, and handling of dissent. By emphasizing the difference between the RSS and the BJP, Bhagwat may be attempting to mitigate some of the backlash against the party by clarifying the RSS’s role as a cultural entity rather than a political one.
The timing of Bhagwat’s address is also significant, as it coincides with upcoming state elections in West Bengal, where the BJP has been trying to strengthen its foothold against the ruling Trinamool Congress. The BJP’s performance in West Bengal has been mixed, and the party has been working to consolidate its support among various demographics, including Hindu voters. By reinforcing the RSS’s cultural mission, Bhagwat may be seeking to rally support for the BJP in the state, framing it as a party that represents Hindu interests without being directly tied to the RSS’s organizational structure.
Historically, the RSS has played a crucial role in shaping the BJP’s ideological framework. Many of the party’s leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have roots in the RSS, which has contributed to the perception that the two entities are inextricably linked. However, Bhagwat’s insistence on their distinction reflects a strategic effort to navigate the complexities of Indian politics, particularly as the BJP faces challenges in maintaining its support base.
The implications of Bhagwat’s address extend beyond the immediate political landscape. As the RSS continues to assert its influence in Indian society, the distinction between its cultural mission and the BJP’s political ambitions may become increasingly relevant. This differentiation could impact how voters perceive the BJP, especially in regions where the party is attempting to expand its reach.
In conclusion, Mohan Bhagwat’s address in Kolkata serves as a reminder of the nuanced relationship between the RSS and the BJP. By advocating for a clearer understanding of their respective roles, Bhagwat aims to address misconceptions and reinforce the RSS’s cultural identity. As India approaches a critical electoral period, the dynamics between these two organizations will likely continue to shape the country’s political discourse.
