In a recent statement that has ignited widespread controversy, a leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) suggested that the primary role of women in marriage is to engage in sexual relations with their husbands. The remarks, made during a public address, have drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, including women’s rights activists, political opponents, and members of the general public.
The comments were made by K. Suresh, a prominent CPM leader and member of the Kerala Legislative Assembly, during a function in Thiruvananthapuram on December 17, 2025. Suresh stated, “Women are married to sleep with their husbands,” a remark that has been interpreted by many as reductive and dismissive of women’s roles in society. The statement quickly went viral on social media, prompting backlash from numerous individuals and organizations advocating for gender equality.
The CPM, which has a significant presence in Kerala, has historically positioned itself as a champion of women’s rights, promoting policies aimed at improving the status of women in society. However, Suresh’s comments have raised questions about the party’s commitment to these ideals and have led to calls for accountability from party leadership. Critics argue that such statements perpetuate harmful stereotypes and undermine the progress made in women’s rights over the past several decades.
In response to the backlash, Suresh attempted to clarify his remarks, stating that his comments were taken out of context and that he did not intend to diminish the value of women beyond their roles as wives. He emphasized that he supports women’s empowerment and their participation in all aspects of life, including politics and the workforce. Despite his attempts at clarification, many remain unconvinced, arguing that the initial statement reflects a deeper societal issue regarding the perception of women’s roles.
The controversy surrounding Suresh’s comments is set against a backdrop of ongoing debates in India about gender roles and the treatment of women in society. While significant strides have been made in recent years to promote gender equality, including legislative measures aimed at protecting women’s rights, deeply ingrained cultural attitudes continue to pose challenges. Incidents of gender-based violence, discrimination, and harassment remain prevalent, highlighting the need for continued advocacy and reform.
The implications of Suresh’s remarks extend beyond the immediate political fallout. They underscore the ongoing struggle for women’s rights in India and the necessity for political leaders to be mindful of their language and the messages they convey. Activists have pointed out that public figures have a responsibility to challenge stereotypes and promote a more equitable society, rather than perpetuating outdated notions of gender roles.
The CPM’s leadership has yet to issue an official statement regarding Suresh’s comments, but party insiders suggest that there may be internal discussions about how to address the situation. The party’s response could have significant ramifications for its image and electoral prospects, particularly in a state like Kerala, where women’s issues are a critical component of political discourse.
As the controversy unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of language in shaping societal attitudes. The reactions to Suresh’s comments reflect a growing intolerance for statements that are perceived as misogynistic or regressive. This incident may also catalyze further discussions about the role of women in Indian society and the need for political leaders to advocate for gender equality actively.
In conclusion, K. Suresh’s remarks have sparked a significant controversy that highlights ongoing challenges related to gender roles in India. The backlash against his comments illustrates the sensitivity surrounding women’s rights issues and the expectations placed on political leaders to promote equality. As the CPM navigates this controversy, the broader implications for gender discourse in India remain to be seen, with many advocating for a more progressive and inclusive approach to women’s roles in society.
